Monthly Systems Round-Up

It’s been an interesting month here at OBE. We started off testing four new systems and two weeks into the testing period we were reduced to three when Matt Bisogno took his Trainer Flat Stats off the market. That was a pity because in the last couple of weeks we’ve been treated to a host of big priced winners from TFS, but those of you who purchased prior to this should be happy with the recent results. I’ll be following it until the end of the season and you should too.

Here is a summary of the other systems we tested this month….

1. Refuse To Lose

This was probably the most interesting of the systems we reviewed, because it was profit from day one with Refuse To Lose and in 18 betting days we made a profit of no less than £860 from just 23 bets, with an impressive 69% strike-rate. You can see the full system test here…

2. The Legacy And Saver System

This is a system that we’ve seen advertised for years and years, but as with everything we still approached it with a degree of caution. As it turned out there was no need for that, because from conservative £20 stakes and a very selective selection process we generated a tidy profit of £429 over the course of the month. We really liked this one… click here to find out why…

3. Bet Accelerator

Bet Accelerator was probably the slowest of the systems we tested (which is funny when you consider the name!), but from tiny stakes we still managed to clear a cool profit of £174. Craig wasn’t so keen on this one as it did require that you watch the market before placing your bets and often the action was slow, but if everything we tested made a profit of 17.5 points profit every month I’m sure we’d all be very happy. You can read all about it here…

All in all, this was an excellent month with a profit of £1,463 generated from the systems we tested and the majority of the time the stakes we used were well within anyone’s budget, so if you’re operating a portfolio of systems (like Jeremy has discussed in some detail on the Four The Win thread this morning) I have to say that I couldn’t put you off any of these.

We’ve got some interesting new system tests that we’ll be putting on the site later today, not least of all The Cambridge Target System which (believe it or not) has generated a profit of £738 in the first three days of us running it, with stakes of just £8.33, £12.50 and £25!

Drop by later for further updates about this one, because if it continues to rack up the profits as quickly as it has been, there’s little doubt in my mind that it WILL live up to its name of…

“The Most Profitable System Ever Published”

The literature that comes with this claims that the system has generated £193,000 profit in the last 11 months with stakes of £33, £50 and £100 (an average profit of £17,000 per month), so I think we should be preparing ourselves for something very, very, special this month!

Until next time,

Online Betting Exposed

Published on May 25, 2008

PS -- Ask a question or leave your comments about this article below...

  1. Paul on June 17th, 2008 1:55 pm

    Just in case anyone wonders where all of the comments from this post have disappeared to, I’ve moved them over to the section below….

    http://www.onlinebettingexposed.com/betting-systems-strategies-forum/

    You’re welcome to post about anything betting related there :)

  2. Craig Moffat on July 25th, 2008 11:01 pm

    Hi Paul,

    Well done to you both on an excellent website and a very informative resource for us punters. Keep the good work, exposing the good and the bad!

    Have you heard anything about a new lay system on the market at http://www.laythatjolly.com
    Maybe you could do a review on this system in the future.

    Best Regards,

    Craig

  3. Mark on July 26th, 2008 8:34 am

    Craig,

    Don’t know about the system but if it’s as good as his marketing I’d stay away…..

    Now I dont like to use the word “system”. (at the top of the page)

    Then goes on to metion ‘The laythatjolly system’ SEVEN times in the rest of the blurb.

    So is it a system or not? my two year ols could have written a better sales page…….

    Cheers

    Mark

Have Your Say: